Great, thank you! One follow-up question to Number 2 and the SADs: How do you calculate cost-effectiveness for orgs who indirectly impact animal suffering? For example, I looked at the Good Food Fund's overview and there was no CE posted, but they have a detailed Theory of Change analysis. Is there a different calculation to recommend charities whose goal is to create systems change that will indirectly reduce suffering, but for which SADs are not as appropriate to calculate?
What can we expect to change in the evaluations or evaluation process for charities from 2023?
What new/different information will charities be asked to provide with the new cost-effectiveness calculation? Will achievements still have a role?
How are the allocations from ACE's charity fund determined?
What does the new decision-making process look like in terms of better accounting for the marginal cost effectiveness of funding?
When will questions and layout for applications be made available for 2025? How much time will charities have to provide information once these are made available?
Great, thank you! One follow-up question to Number 2 and the SADs: How do you calculate cost-effectiveness for orgs who indirectly impact animal suffering? For example, I looked at the Good Food Fund's overview and there was no CE posted, but they have a detailed Theory of Change analysis. Is there a different calculation to recommend charities whose goal is to create systems change that will indirectly reduce suffering, but for which SADs are not as appropriate to calculate?