Hide table of contents

Overview

These are my notes of the "State of the Movement for Farmed Animals" from EAGxBerkeley, given by Monica Chen, Executive Director of the New Roots Institute.

While I did my best to capture highlights, these notes are not exhaustive - Monica's talk was full of interesting information indeed.

==================

Talk Notes

“Animals need EA”

  • Marketing of farmed animal products shows green hills and happy animals. That’s not the case.
  • Q: How many animals are killed for meat, dairy, eggs in the US every year? 
    • A: 10 billion
  • Q: How many of those are raised on factory farms? 
    • A: 99%
  • Animals in the industry are treated very inhumanely

 

The farmed animal advocacy movement is very varied. You have farmer advocates, people concerned about health, etc. 

 

"How Do We End Factory Farming?” - Types of Interventions

  • Learn from past, successful movements?
  • People have different timelines for that. That results in different interventions.

Supply and Demand Strategies

  • Impacting Supply
    • Idea: if we change the supply, that will change the demand.
      • Example: impossible burger at Burger King
    • Alternative proteins
    • Disadvantages to these strategies:
      • You need to make sure there’s “price, taste and convenience” parity, which is hard to do
  • Impacting Demand
    • Via raising awareness
      • Via movies/shows. Ex: game changers
        • Problem: very hard to get into mainstream media channels
      • Leafleting
        • Problem: hard to know if it even works
        • Advantage: it’s a low-barrier entry, an easy way to get people involved in the community.

Corporate Outreach

  • Advantages:
    • High leverage. Few decision makers that have tons of impact. 
  • Disadvantages:
    • Easy for corps to say they’ll do something and not follow through. Then they get the positive press for the promise but don’t pay the price on flaking.

Law and Policy

  • Using those to get lots of press
  • A lot of change where we have key allies

Sanctuaries

  • Disadvantages: very expensive with very little impact (low ROI).
  • Advantages: 
    • An easy way for people to get their start in the movement
    • Education for general population (schools etc.)
      • (bigger educational impact for the ones closer to urban areas)

"Building the Movement" Organizations

 

New Roots Institute Strategy

  • Educating
  • Recruiting
  • Training
  • Positioning (i.e. having animal advocates in mission-adjacent organizations.)
    • “Biggest message: each of us is uniquely positioned to create change” 

1

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 3d ago · 1m read
 · 
Hi FAST!  After decades of tireless advocacy, Sweden has become cage-free – a historic achievement for hens and for everyone who has stood by their side. Millions of hens once endured life in cramped cages, but thanks to Project 1882’s persistent, long-term efforts, there are now no hens kept in cages anywhere in Sweden.  This breakthrough is unique. To our knowledge, Sweden is the only country in the world to have gone cage-free without a legal ban. Project 1882 confirmed this shift by obtaining data from regional authorities and the egg industry.  In 1988, the Swedish Parliament voted to ban cages – but that promise to the hens was ultimately broken. In response, Project 1882 intensified its efforts: publishing detailed reports, launching repeated public awareness campaigns, holding corporate dialogues, and engaging directly with policymakers.   Thanks to these efforts, and following discussions with Project 1882, more than 85 companies –– from retailers to hotel and restaurant chains – have taken a stand against cage eggs. Since 2008, over 17 million hens have been spared a life in cages.  This success shows what persistent, collective action can achieve – even when political will falls short.  At the EU level, Project 1882 also collected 50,000 signatures for the End the Cage Age initiative, pushing for a ban across the EU. With delays pushing the proposal to 2026, Project 1882 is now urging Sweden to take the final step: A legal ban on cages, to ensure they never return.  Read more: https://www.project1882.org/news/sweden-becomes-cage-free  
 · 7d ago · 1m read
 · 
Hello FAST! I hope you have a great week! We have a new announcement about Muxsa, a nationally distributed manufacturer that sells to 10 supermarkets and more than 30 organic stores in the departments of Lima, Arequipa, Trujillo, and Chiclayo in Peru. MUXSA COOKIES Link: https://sites.google.com/view/muxsagalletas/nosotros Scale: National - Peru Who: Arba Failed tactics: None Successful tactics: Working from the beginning of conversations with the entire team, owner, and production chain. Scalability: Developing other nationally distributed brands. Follow-up: We will stay in touch to request reports on its implementation. Best regards,
 · 4d ago · 7m read
 · 
Each year, Animal Charity Evaluators (ACE) invites animal charities from around the world to apply for our in-depth evaluations. Our goal is to identify the most impactful giving opportunities for donors seeking to contribute to a world where all animals can flourish. We are thrilled to announce that 10 charities have been selected for this year’s charity evaluations, based on their excellent applications and the highly promising nature of their work. Among these are six current Recommended Charities that are being re-evaluated before their two-year recommendation status expires: Faunalytics, Legal Impact for Chickens, New Roots Institute, Shrimp Welfare Project, The Humane League, and Wild Animal Initiative. On November 4, 2025, some of this year’s evaluated charities will be awarded ACE’s two-year recommendation status, joining the five charities recommended in 2024: Aquatic Life Institute, Çiftlik Hayvanlarını Koruma Derneği, Dansk Vegetarisk Forening, Good Food Fund, and Sinergia Animal. All charities evaluated by ACE have undergone a thorough selection process and have demonstrated significant potential in running cost-effective programs and engaging in impactful work. Even those that are not ultimately recommended are likely among the most effective in their respective fields. Below, we give an overview of our selection process and introduce the 10 charities that successfully reached the evaluation stage in 2025. Our Selection Process Our selection process is an initial assessment of applicants’ programs, with a focus on their theory of change and the scale of their impact for animals. The process is designed to ensure that we dedicate our resources to evaluating organizations with strong potential to be among the most impactful giving opportunities in the world. In 2025, our selection process began with 43 initial applicants, which were narrowed to 25 charities after an eligibility screening. These organizations then underwent a detailed assessment in w