Hide table of contents

Overview

These are my notes of the "State of the Movement for Farmed Animals" from EAGxBerkeley, given by Monica Chen, Executive Director of the New Roots Institute.

While I did my best to capture highlights, these notes are not exhaustive - Monica's talk was full of interesting information indeed.

==================

Talk Notes

“Animals need EA”

  • Marketing of farmed animal products shows green hills and happy animals. That’s not the case.
  • Q: How many animals are killed for meat, dairy, eggs in the US every year? 
    • A: 10 billion
  • Q: How many of those are raised on factory farms? 
    • A: 99%
  • Animals in the industry are treated very inhumanely

 

The farmed animal advocacy movement is very varied. You have farmer advocates, people concerned about health, etc. 

 

"How Do We End Factory Farming?” - Types of Interventions

  • Learn from past, successful movements?
  • People have different timelines for that. That results in different interventions.

Supply and Demand Strategies

  • Impacting Supply
    • Idea: if we change the supply, that will change the demand.
      • Example: impossible burger at Burger King
    • Alternative proteins
    • Disadvantages to these strategies:
      • You need to make sure there’s “price, taste and convenience” parity, which is hard to do
  • Impacting Demand
    • Via raising awareness
      • Via movies/shows. Ex: game changers
        • Problem: very hard to get into mainstream media channels
      • Leafleting
        • Problem: hard to know if it even works
        • Advantage: it’s a low-barrier entry, an easy way to get people involved in the community.

Corporate Outreach

  • Advantages:
    • High leverage. Few decision makers that have tons of impact. 
  • Disadvantages:
    • Easy for corps to say they’ll do something and not follow through. Then they get the positive press for the promise but don’t pay the price on flaking.

Law and Policy

  • Using those to get lots of press
  • A lot of change where we have key allies

Sanctuaries

  • Disadvantages: very expensive with very little impact (low ROI).
  • Advantages: 
    • An easy way for people to get their start in the movement
    • Education for general population (schools etc.)
      • (bigger educational impact for the ones closer to urban areas)

"Building the Movement" Organizations

 

New Roots Institute Strategy

  • Educating
  • Recruiting
  • Training
  • Positioning (i.e. having animal advocates in mission-adjacent organizations.)
    • “Biggest message: each of us is uniquely positioned to create change” 

1

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 2d ago · 1m read
 · 
Hello everyone! We are pleased to share great news from Peru: Bill No. 12220/2025-CR has been introduced to the Congress of the Republic for the first time. This bill requires the use of anesthesia and analgesia for the detusking, tail docking, and castration of baby pigs. This bill, drafted by ARBA and promoted in collaboration with Te Protejo, will be accompanied by a media campaign to raise public awareness about these practices, which are largely unknown but cause unnecessary suffering to millions of piglets each year. The initiative is currently before the Agrarian Commission, where a long and complex phase of working groups and meetings with its members awaits us. At ARBA, we will align our strategies to address this process, aware that it will be challenging, but convinced of its importance in advancing the protection of animals raised for consumption in Peru. Since 2016, our country has had an Animal Welfare Law that prohibits unnecessary animal suffering. However, specific regulations are still needed to put an end to these practices that continue to cause avoidable pain. We invite you to sign and share the petition in support of this bill: https://chng.it/dkyVCXBNVm   If you would like us to send you the bill presented, please let us know, we would be happy to share it. Have a great week! Iselda
nunomalvim
 · 2d ago · 3m read
 · 
Hi Fast community! Just announcing a recent court case involving animal rights investigations that we think might be interesting as a benchmark. In Portugal, the organization Frente Animal has run a campaign against Jerónimo Martins, the largest food retailer in the country (under the Pingo Doce brand), and one of the largest in Europe as well (19th largest), as they also operate in Poland (Biedronka). Using undercover footage from broiler farms that clearly linked animal cruelty to their supply chain, they were pressured to adopt a series of reforms aligned with the ECC (European Chicken Commitment). Their immediate response was to charge us with defamation and to threaten judicial action the very next day after the campaign’s launch. They held their ground and moved forward with what has been seen as a typical SLAPP measure: a cease and desist order that demanded all campaign content be removed, and that Frente Animal pay a hefty fine if it did not comply. This was already groundbreaking for Portugal, as it was the first time that farmed animal welfare and rights were discussed in a court of law. Moreover, footage from these farms was extensively broadcast during the public court sessions. Eventually, with the support of an excellent attorney experienced in this area, the judge decided in favor of Frente Animal, rejecting the precautionary measure filed by Pingo Doce (Jerónimo Martins). In the ruling, the court recognized “the veracity of the images shown and the mistreatment to which animals are subjected during intensive farming, which must be banned.” We understand this paves the way for future legal advancements. Below we emphasize some points about what went well, what didn’t go so well, and what we’ve learned.   What went well (The Good) * The court recognized that there is clear animal cruelty in the broiler industry as a whole, which should be banned. They acknowledged the legitimacy of the footage and what was documented. * Frente Animal was a
Alene
 · 2h ago · 1m read
 · 
Victory! The California Court of Appeal summarily denied Alexandre’s writ petition in the animal-cruelty lawsuit, Legal Impact for Chickens v. Alexandre Family Farm!  Alexandre had urged the appellate court to intervene and overturn the Humboldt County Superior Court's ruling that LIC, as a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, had the power to sue Alexandre for cruelty. The case will now return to Humboldt Superior Court to determine whether Alexandre illegally neglects and abuses its cattle. LIC's lawsuit cites an April 2024 exposé by charity Farm Forward which revealed “systemic deception, cruelty, and animal abuse” at Alexandre.  Learn more and read the ruling here: https://www.legalimpactforchickens.org/alexandre  
 · 4d ago · 1m read
 · 
ICARE is preparing live editions of our Contemporary Issues in Animal Rights Law (CIARL)  live course tailored to Africa and Latin America — and we want to hear from you! Your input will help us design courses that truly reflect the realities, priorities, and needs of advocates, students, and professionals across these regions. Surveys: - Africa (English) - Latin America (English) - Latin America (Spanish)  🎁 As a thank-you for completing the survey, you can enter a draw for: - Free access to our CIARL on-demand course (available now in English) - Discounted places in the upcoming Africa or Latin America live editions (2026) Some of you may also become part of a pilot group helping to finalise the design of the courses. 📅 Deadline: 30 September 2025 ⏱ Time required: 10 minutes Please also kindly share (LI or IG) these surveys with your networks to help us gather diverse and representative input. Together, we can make these regional editions of the CIARL course accessible, inclusive, and impactful. Thank you very much in advance! In solidarity, The ICARE team