Hide table of contents

The global campaign against octopus farming is gaining momentum, with legislative victories including bans in California and Washington State. The introduction of a federal bill, which also includes a ban on the importation of farmed octopus, represents another pivotal moment in the fight against this cruel and harmful practice. These wins highlight the growing awareness of the myriad issues associated with octopus aquaculture, which include:

 

  • Exploitation of Animals: Octopuses are highly intelligent, solitary animals capable of suffering. Farming them leads to overcrowded conditions, which can result in heightened aggression, cannibalism, and stress. To date, no humane slaughter methods exist, and their fragile bodies make them highly susceptible to environmental changes, causing further harm.
     
  • Environmental Damage: Octopus farming relies on wild-caught feed (octopuses are carnivorous), worsening overfishing and biodiversity loss. Effluents from farms harm local ecosystems, while escapes risk spreading disease, antibiotics, and pathogens.
     
  • Public Health Concerns: Antibiotic use in octopus farming would increase the risk of antibiotic resistance, posing a serious threat to human, animal, and environmental health.

 

Scientific experts, NGOs, and policymakers globally oppose octopus farming due to its ethical, environmental, and public health implications. Learn more about all of the threats that octopus farming poses in our report, “Why Cephalopod Farming Must be Rejected Before it Starts”.

 

The Uncertain Future of Nueva Pescanova’s Farm

 

While global efforts against the practice have spurred action, one lingering question remains: What’s happening with Nueva Pescanova’s controversial octopus farm in Spain?

 

Recent developments paint an unclear picture of the project. Reports suggest conflicting narratives from various angles: One suggests that the project has stalled, citing scientific failures and opposition from the local Port Authority, while another reports that Nueva Pescanova denies these claims, insisting that the project is still in progress. According to the report by Canarias7, this could possibly be to maintain investor interest.

 

This conflict reveals a concerning reality: despite significant pushback and evidence against the viability of octopus farming, Nueva Pescanova appears intent on proceeding. Their persistence suggests a disregard of ethical, ecological, and societal concerns.

 

Government Pushback and Advocacy Efforts

 

There are, however, continued signs of resistance. Earlier this year, the Canary Islands government denied the company’s application for a simple environmental permit. Instead, they required a comprehensive environmental impact assessment, underscoring the high risks posed by this project. Aquatic Life Institute (ALI) has been at the forefront of this fight, submitting letters to local environmental agencies and emphasizing the grave implications of proceeding with octopus farming.

 

This pushback, coupled with legislative victories in the United States and scientific criticisms, suggests that the project’s significant hurdles are ongoing. As the cracks in Nueva Pescanova’s plans become more evident, we are increasingly determined and confident in our efforts to ultimately halt the farm’s development.

 

Continuing the Fight

 

At its core, octopus farming is emblematic of the worst aspects of industrial animal agriculture - prioritizing profit over ethical responsibility and environmental and public health. While the future of Nueva Pescanova's farm project remains uncertain, the fight against octopus farming, including this specific project, is far from over. 

 

Aquatic Life Institute is committed to maintaining pressure and expanding the campaign globally. Our Octopus Farming Ban Campaign remains steadfast in advocating for legislative protections, enforcing seafood certification bans and retailer bans, to ensure that octopus farming is stopped in its early stages across all fronts.

 

Continue to support our efforts to stop octopus farming and advocate for aquatic animal welfare through our end-of-year Giving Season campaign. Thanks to the generosity of Mobius, every donation will be matched dollar-for-dollar, up to $15K, doubling your impact!

3

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 5d ago · 1m read
 · 
We’re thrilled to share a victory for animals and truth in advertising! Thanks to Animal Outlook’s lawsuit, filed with the incredible support of Legal Impact for Chickens (LIC), the nearly 100-year-old DC butcher shop, Harvey’s Market, has agreed to stop selling foie gras forever. The case, filed in the District of Columbia Superior Court, challenged Harvey’s Market’s alleged deceptive advertising practices related to foie gras. The lawsuit alleged that Harvey’s Market falsely promoted foie gras as “HUMANELY RAISED STOCK” and “FREE RANGE,” among other allegedly misleading claims. These statements were displayed inside Harvey’s Market in a manner that suggested they applied to every product in the meat case, including foie gras. AO and LIC argued that animals subjected to gavage (force-feeding) to produce foie gras can never be “humanely raised,” and that animals raised entirely indoors without outdoor access cannot be considered “free range.” Thanks to the efforts of LIC’s amazing legal team—Kathryn Evans and Alene Anello—we were able to send the message that deceptive claims about animal welfare will not go unchallenged. As part of the case, LIC sourced a unique poll of DC consumers to show 75% believe “humane raised stock” to be an inaccurate description of the birds used to make foie gras. A further 80% said they would not consider such birds to be “free range”. And when shown an image of the meat case from Harvey’s Market approximately 65% said they thought the signage applied to all products in the case, including the foie gras.  While Harvey’s Market did not admit liability, Animal Outlook voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit on July 1, 2025, following the confidential settlement agreement.    
Luiz Rezende
 · 3d ago · 1m read
 · 
Hi all! We’re happy to share that Super Festval, a supermarket brand part of Grupo Beal (former “Companhia Beal de Alimentos’), has officially published a commitment to exclusively source pork from group housing systems during gestation in Brazil by 2028, considering preferably preimplantation systems where sows are housed in stalls for no longer than 7 days. You can read the announcement in Portuguese on the company website here. Super Festval is a traditional family business with a local well-known brand and 39 stores in the state of Paraná, south of Brazil. The organizations Alianima, Fórum Animal, Humane World for Animals and Sinergia Animal engaged in corporate relationship with the company for 5 years of negotiations, combining strategies of friendly negotiation, technical support and public campaign warning to accelerate the commitment. The negotiations were positively influenced by the fact that Super Festval has a cage-free commitment fulfilled in 2024 (see their report to the Egglab audit). This is a successful case to strengthen animal welfare policies negotiations with retailers in Brazil. At the moment, it's important to increase the number of animal welfare policies implemented in Brazilian retail in order to promote progress in this sector that is traditionally less receptive to animal welfare policies. We will continue monitoring the implementation of Super Festval commitment, encouraging the company to report their evolution annually, asking to participate in Alianima’s Pig Watch report and extending its animal welfare policies to additional species, for example nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). For the animals,
 · 4d ago · 1m read
 · 
Today marks a historic win for animal advocacy in Brazil, thanks to the combined efforts of Humane World for Animals, Te Protejo, , Fórum Animal and Change.org .  On July 9, 2025, Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies approved the Senate substitute for PL 6602/13 (now PL 3062/22), banning federal animal testing for cosmetics, personal hygiene products, and perfumes. Why this is huge: •⁠  ⁠1.6 million+ signatures delivered a powerful public mandate. •⁠  ⁠A decade in the making—originally filed in 2013, it finally broke its long legislative stalemate. •⁠  ⁠Brazil moves closer to becoming the world’s 45th country to outlaw cosmetic animal testing, sparing millions of animals from suffering. Besides us, the project had the support of many activists and other organizations and institutions such as the Department of Animal Protection that was created within the Ministry of the Environment in Brazil. Next steps: The bill goes to presidential signature. After enactment and a 60-day vacatio legis, ANVISA and other agencies will have up to two years to implement alternative testing methods and enforce the law. This breakthrough proves what we can achieve when we unite. Let’s keep up the momentum—share this news, raise your voice, and push for a cruelty-free future! 
 · 14h ago · 1m read
 · 
Iceland Foods committed to eliminating eyestalk ablation and implementing pre-slaughter electric stunning across their own-label prawn range by the end of 2027. ICAW has been running a campaign against Iceland for several months inclusive of digital actions, in-person demonstrations (including 70 people gathering in London in May) and other pressure tactics. Only 3 retailers have yet to commit to higher prawn welfare in the UK: Aldi, LIDL and ASDA. Thank you to everyone involved for supporting our campaign! For any additional information please contact Justine at jaudemard@i-caw.org