Hide table of contents

The global campaign against octopus farming is gaining momentum, with legislative victories including bans in California and Washington State. The introduction of a federal bill, which also includes a ban on the importation of farmed octopus, represents another pivotal moment in the fight against this cruel and harmful practice. These wins highlight the growing awareness of the myriad issues associated with octopus aquaculture, which include:

 

  • Exploitation of Animals: Octopuses are highly intelligent, solitary animals capable of suffering. Farming them leads to overcrowded conditions, which can result in heightened aggression, cannibalism, and stress. To date, no humane slaughter methods exist, and their fragile bodies make them highly susceptible to environmental changes, causing further harm.
     
  • Environmental Damage: Octopus farming relies on wild-caught feed (octopuses are carnivorous), worsening overfishing and biodiversity loss. Effluents from farms harm local ecosystems, while escapes risk spreading disease, antibiotics, and pathogens.
     
  • Public Health Concerns: Antibiotic use in octopus farming would increase the risk of antibiotic resistance, posing a serious threat to human, animal, and environmental health.

 

Scientific experts, NGOs, and policymakers globally oppose octopus farming due to its ethical, environmental, and public health implications. Learn more about all of the threats that octopus farming poses in our report, “Why Cephalopod Farming Must be Rejected Before it Starts”.

 

The Uncertain Future of Nueva Pescanova’s Farm

 

While global efforts against the practice have spurred action, one lingering question remains: What’s happening with Nueva Pescanova’s controversial octopus farm in Spain?

 

Recent developments paint an unclear picture of the project. Reports suggest conflicting narratives from various angles: One suggests that the project has stalled, citing scientific failures and opposition from the local Port Authority, while another reports that Nueva Pescanova denies these claims, insisting that the project is still in progress. According to the report by Canarias7, this could possibly be to maintain investor interest.

 

This conflict reveals a concerning reality: despite significant pushback and evidence against the viability of octopus farming, Nueva Pescanova appears intent on proceeding. Their persistence suggests a disregard of ethical, ecological, and societal concerns.

 

Government Pushback and Advocacy Efforts

 

There are, however, continued signs of resistance. Earlier this year, the Canary Islands government denied the company’s application for a simple environmental permit. Instead, they required a comprehensive environmental impact assessment, underscoring the high risks posed by this project. Aquatic Life Institute (ALI) has been at the forefront of this fight, submitting letters to local environmental agencies and emphasizing the grave implications of proceeding with octopus farming.

 

This pushback, coupled with legislative victories in the United States and scientific criticisms, suggests that the project’s significant hurdles are ongoing. As the cracks in Nueva Pescanova’s plans become more evident, we are increasingly determined and confident in our efforts to ultimately halt the farm’s development.

 

Continuing the Fight

 

At its core, octopus farming is emblematic of the worst aspects of industrial animal agriculture - prioritizing profit over ethical responsibility and environmental and public health. While the future of Nueva Pescanova's farm project remains uncertain, the fight against octopus farming, including this specific project, is far from over. 

 

Aquatic Life Institute is committed to maintaining pressure and expanding the campaign globally. Our Octopus Farming Ban Campaign remains steadfast in advocating for legislative protections, enforcing seafood certification bans and retailer bans, to ensure that octopus farming is stopped in its early stages across all fronts.

 

Continue to support our efforts to stop octopus farming and advocate for aquatic animal welfare through our end-of-year Giving Season campaign. Thanks to the generosity of Mobius, every donation will be matched dollar-for-dollar, up to $15K, doubling your impact!

3

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

There are no more recommendations left.

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 6d ago · 1m read
 · 
Dear Colleagues, The Animal Law Foundation has placed a fake advertisement in London to raise awareness about the contrast between what the public is sold and the reality of animal farming. This follows a report and an investigation into how animals raised for food are depicted and the reality of the lives animals live. Actress and comedian Diane Morgan and TV Presenter Wendy Turner joined us to raise awareness about this Food Chain Misinformation! The Animal Law Foundations work included an investigation into supermarkets, producers and the media in the UK, which revealed that the dominant image for animal farming is happy and healthy animals outside, this is despite the fact 85% are raised on industrial farms. This is against the backdrop of laws and rules protecting consumers and the public from misleading and dishonest information. You can learn more about our work here and read the report here.  You can find photos from the day and ways you can support the action in our partner pack here. Please also find our links to one of our films from the day with Diane Morgan below, we would be grateful if you could share on your platforms. X (Twitter) Instagram Linkedin Bluesky Threads TikTok YouTube Thank you for all your support, Morgane
 · 6d ago · 1m read
 · 
In the vegan and animal advocacy movement, operations professionals are the engine behind the mission - keeping organizations running smoothly, sustainably, and strategically. But let’s be honest: being “in operations” often means wearing every hat at once. You’re responding to people’s needs, managing financial activity, ensuring legal compliance, maintaining systems, and reducing risk and solving unexpected problems - sometimes all in a single day. On top of that, you’re shaping internal culture, promoting wellbeing to prevent burnout, reimagining how teams work together, and exploring how AI can support your mission. It’s a complex mix of responsibilities and specialties - all of it essential, and much of it out of sight. To support, strengthen and celebrate this critical leadership, PEPR is launching 'Enabling Impact: The Animal Advocacy Ops Collective' - an Operations Community for the Farmed Animal & Vegan Advocacy Movement - a collaborative space for connection, shared insights, and collective impact. Members will also gain access to tailored programming, tools, and trend insights designed to help you thrive in your role and power your organization forward.  Please head over to our sign up page to let us know if you are interested in taking part. This new program is in addition to PEPR's existing program offering strategic & advisory operational support to farmed animal advocacy organizations through which we accept organizations on a rolling basis. 
 · 4d ago · 10m read
 · 
A hidden crisis Literally, quintillions1 of animals are suffering and dying right now in the wild, due to disease, hunger, thirst, excessive heat or cold, and other factors. Yet, most people—including those who express concern for animals—fail to give importance to this issue. Why? In this article, we explore the cognitive biases2 that lead us to ignore one of the world’s largest sources of suffering and death.3 Understanding these biases can help us think more clearly about our moral responsibilities. The magnitude of the problem When we think of animal suffering, we often picture factory farms or labs that test on animals. These are indeed serious problems. But the number of wild animals is vastly larger, estimated between 1 and 10 quintillion at any given time.4 To understand this, consider the following analogy: If we compressed the total number of animals exploited by humans and the total number of wild animals into a one-year timeline, the animals used by humans would represent just 14 seconds. Wild animals would represent the remaining 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 46 seconds.1 The vast majority of wild animals suffer daily due to natural causes. Despite its immense scale, this issue receives very little attention. Even among animal advocates and animal ethicists, the problem remains largely ignored. This doesn’t seem logical when looking at the figures. Below, we will explore several biases that can cause this. Status quo bias: Resistance to changing beliefs Our minds are naturally resistant to change, whether in habits or beliefs. This is known as status quo bias. Several related patterns reinforce this: * Bandwagon effect: we tend to believe what those around us believe * System justification bias: we defend current systems and norms * Conservatism bias: we hesitate to update our beliefs, even with new evidence Key question: If everyone around you focused only on animal exploitation, how likely would you be to think about the suffering o
Recent opportunities