Hide table of contents

Hello, FAST!

As a team, we are thrilled to introduce you to the website of our Aquatic Welfare program—an initiative dedicated to raising awareness about the challenges faced by aquatic animals.

Our primary focus is the new Aquaculture Law. As some of you may know, the presidential message that will initiate this bill began to take shape last year, drafted by lawyers from the Undersecretariat of Fisheries and Aquaculture. From day one, we have been actively engaged in the process, participating in government-led workshops across different regions, preparing reports for the public participation process, and holding meetings with the project’s drafters.

There is still a long road ahead, particularly with the legislative process, which will take place in Congress throughout 2025 and could potentially extend into 2026.

This new law presents many key issues to explore, from defining the fundamental principles of animal welfare that should be regulated, to the challenge of determining how broad or specific the President will choose to make the bill. Additionally, it raises the question of potential bans on new farmed species, such as octopuses—an emerging species in Chile's aquaculture industry.

We invite you to learn more, support this initiative, and share your feedback. We also hope that our efforts serve as a valuable resource for other organizations joining this crucial legal process that Chile will face in the coming years.

Of course, we are proud members of the Aquatic Animal Alliance, reinforcing our commitment to the global protection of aquatic animals. We also deeply appreciate that Igualdad Animal México led our work on this topic throughout the past year.

Thank you for your interest and dedication to defending aquatic animals! 🌊🐟

Marysabel Pavez

Director

Fundación Derecho y Defensa Animal (DYDAnimal Chile or DYDA)

5

4
0
5
3

Reactions

4
0
5
3
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 5d ago · 10m read
 · 
A hidden crisis Literally, quintillions1 of animals are suffering and dying right now in the wild, due to disease, hunger, thirst, excessive heat or cold, and other factors. Yet, most people—including those who express concern for animals—fail to give importance to this issue. Why? In this article, we explore the cognitive biases2 that lead us to ignore one of the world’s largest sources of suffering and death.3 Understanding these biases can help us think more clearly about our moral responsibilities. The magnitude of the problem When we think of animal suffering, we often picture factory farms or labs that test on animals. These are indeed serious problems. But the number of wild animals is vastly larger, estimated between 1 and 10 quintillion at any given time.4 To understand this, consider the following analogy: If we compressed the total number of animals exploited by humans and the total number of wild animals into a one-year timeline, the animals used by humans would represent just 14 seconds. Wild animals would represent the remaining 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 46 seconds.1 The vast majority of wild animals suffer daily due to natural causes. Despite its immense scale, this issue receives very little attention. Even among animal advocates and animal ethicists, the problem remains largely ignored. This doesn’t seem logical when looking at the figures. Below, we will explore several biases that can cause this. Status quo bias: Resistance to changing beliefs Our minds are naturally resistant to change, whether in habits or beliefs. This is known as status quo bias. Several related patterns reinforce this: * Bandwagon effect: we tend to believe what those around us believe * System justification bias: we defend current systems and norms * Conservatism bias: we hesitate to update our beliefs, even with new evidence Key question: If everyone around you focused only on animal exploitation, how likely would you be to think about the suffering o
Recent opportunities