Hide table of contents
by Sage Max
Oct 15 20243 min read 0

1

Legal & PolicyFarmed Animals
Frontpage

Today, animal protection groups Animal Outlook and Legal Impact for Chickens filed suit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Civil Division, against DC butcher shop Harvey’s Market for misleading marketing practices regarding its foie gras, which is sold under an advertising banner with the phrases “humanely raised stock,” “all-natural,” and “free range.”

Please find a full press release here and below, and the complaint here. If you’d like more information, or to speak with the legal team, please contact my colleague Kathryn Evans at 888-581-8797 and kathryn@legalimpactforchickens.org.

Thank you,
Sage

 

__

Foie Gras Faux Pas? DC Butcher Shop Sued for Deceptively Advertising the “Fatty Liver” as Humane

For Immediate Release: October 15, 2024

Washington - This morning, animal protection groups Animal Outlook and Legal Impact for Chickens filed suit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Civil Division, against DC butcher shop Harvey’s Market for misleading marketing practices. As alleged in the complaint, the vendor at DC’s trendy Union Market sells foie gras under an advertising banner with the phrases “humanely raised stock,” “all-natural,” and “free range.” But the foie gras comes from birds who were force-fed via tubes two to three times a day for up to three weeks to enlarge their livers as much as tenfold, and who were kept entirely indoors, according to the lawsuit. 

The foie gras sold by Harvey’s Market is labeled as coming from New York’s Hudson Valley, where the two largest foie gras producers in the United States—Hudson Valley Foie Gras, LLC and La Belle Farm, Inc.—are located. The producers receive thousands of ducklings each week. When the ducks hit 13 weeks of age, an employee starts putting a tube into each bird’s throat first twice, then three times per day, pumping food directly to the bottom of the duck’s esophagus. The producers do this to every duck every day for 16–21 days, and then slaughter the duck. As alleged in the complaint, this forced feeding causes liver disease (“foie gras” literally means “fatty liver”) and various other health issues in the ducks; repeatedly forcing tubes down their throats may also cause the ducks fear and pain. 

“Life is grim for the animals violently force-fed multiple times a day before being slaughtered for Harvey’s Market,” says Legal Impact for Chickens President Alene Anello. “The shop’s customers expect and deserve an honest and quality shopping experience, yet they are blatantly deceived about the feathered former owners of the diseased livers being peddled to them.”

“There is nothing humane about force-feeding ducks to produce foie gras,” says Animal Outlook Executive Director Ben Williamson. “Stuffing pipes down their throats and pumping huge amounts of grain into their stomachs is a cruelty that we can all live without, and one that has been condemned by top avian experts and leading veterinarians, and has been banned in the state of California. Consumers deserve transparency and truth, not deceptive marketing that hides the cruelty behind these practices. The truth is that the main ingredient in foie gras is cruelty to animals.”
 

ABOUT ANIMAL OUTLOOK

Animal Outlook is a national nonprofit 501(c)(3) animal advocacy organization based in Washington, DC, and Los Angeles, California. It is strategically challenging animal agribusiness through undercover investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and disseminating information about the many harms of animal agriculture, empowering everyone to choose vegan. Follow the group on X, Facebook, Instagram, or YouTube, and visit TryVeg.

ABOUT LEGAL IMPACT FOR CHICKENS

Legal Impact for Chickens (LIC) is a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals and a 501(c)(3) litigation charity. As featured in the Washington Post, LIC advocates for farmed animals by civilly enforcing existing cruelty laws in an agricultural context. Follow the group on X, Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn.


 

Contact:

Kathryn Evans, Legal Impact for Chickens

888-581-8797

kathryn@legalimpactforchickens.org
 

Ben Williamson, Animal Outlook

310-874 0009

bwilliamson@animaloutlook.org

 

PHOTO CREDIT: We Animals Media

1

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

There are no more recommendations left.

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 6d ago · 1m read
 · 
Dear Colleagues, The Animal Law Foundation has placed a fake advertisement in London to raise awareness about the contrast between what the public is sold and the reality of animal farming. This follows a report and an investigation into how animals raised for food are depicted and the reality of the lives animals live. Actress and comedian Diane Morgan and TV Presenter Wendy Turner joined us to raise awareness about this Food Chain Misinformation! The Animal Law Foundations work included an investigation into supermarkets, producers and the media in the UK, which revealed that the dominant image for animal farming is happy and healthy animals outside, this is despite the fact 85% are raised on industrial farms. This is against the backdrop of laws and rules protecting consumers and the public from misleading and dishonest information. You can learn more about our work here and read the report here.  You can find photos from the day and ways you can support the action in our partner pack here. Please also find our links to one of our films from the day with Diane Morgan below, we would be grateful if you could share on your platforms. X (Twitter) Instagram Linkedin Bluesky Threads TikTok YouTube Thank you for all your support, Morgane
 · 6d ago · 1m read
 · 
In the vegan and animal advocacy movement, operations professionals are the engine behind the mission - keeping organizations running smoothly, sustainably, and strategically. But let’s be honest: being “in operations” often means wearing every hat at once. You’re responding to people’s needs, managing financial activity, ensuring legal compliance, maintaining systems, and reducing risk and solving unexpected problems - sometimes all in a single day. On top of that, you’re shaping internal culture, promoting wellbeing to prevent burnout, reimagining how teams work together, and exploring how AI can support your mission. It’s a complex mix of responsibilities and specialties - all of it essential, and much of it out of sight. To support, strengthen and celebrate this critical leadership, PEPR is launching 'Enabling Impact: The Animal Advocacy Ops Collective' - an Operations Community for the Farmed Animal & Vegan Advocacy Movement - a collaborative space for connection, shared insights, and collective impact. Members will also gain access to tailored programming, tools, and trend insights designed to help you thrive in your role and power your organization forward.  Please head over to our sign up page to let us know if you are interested in taking part. This new program is in addition to PEPR's existing program offering strategic & advisory operational support to farmed animal advocacy organizations through which we accept organizations on a rolling basis. 
 · 4d ago · 10m read
 · 
A hidden crisis Literally, quintillions1 of animals are suffering and dying right now in the wild, due to disease, hunger, thirst, excessive heat or cold, and other factors. Yet, most people—including those who express concern for animals—fail to give importance to this issue. Why? In this article, we explore the cognitive biases2 that lead us to ignore one of the world’s largest sources of suffering and death.3 Understanding these biases can help us think more clearly about our moral responsibilities. The magnitude of the problem When we think of animal suffering, we often picture factory farms or labs that test on animals. These are indeed serious problems. But the number of wild animals is vastly larger, estimated between 1 and 10 quintillion at any given time.4 To understand this, consider the following analogy: If we compressed the total number of animals exploited by humans and the total number of wild animals into a one-year timeline, the animals used by humans would represent just 14 seconds. Wild animals would represent the remaining 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 46 seconds.1 The vast majority of wild animals suffer daily due to natural causes. Despite its immense scale, this issue receives very little attention. Even among animal advocates and animal ethicists, the problem remains largely ignored. This doesn’t seem logical when looking at the figures. Below, we will explore several biases that can cause this. Status quo bias: Resistance to changing beliefs Our minds are naturally resistant to change, whether in habits or beliefs. This is known as status quo bias. Several related patterns reinforce this: * Bandwagon effect: we tend to believe what those around us believe * System justification bias: we defend current systems and norms * Conservatism bias: we hesitate to update our beliefs, even with new evidence Key question: If everyone around you focused only on animal exploitation, how likely would you be to think about the suffering o
Recent opportunities
View more