Hello FAST community members! 

The Italian pig producer Filiera Madeo, known for its free-range black pig production, has recently released a new cage-free policy that also extends to its newly established white pig production. It is the second company to join our campaign, SOS Pig, advocating for minimum standards in pig farming. 

Madeo's new policy includes the elimination of sow stalls and farrowing crates, which are already not used. Sows are bred outdoors in groups throughout their entire pregnancy, including the initial one-month observation period that the current EU legislation would allow in cages. During farrowing, sows are kept indoors in individual free-farrowing pens with an area of 9m2 (above EFSA's recommendations of 7.8m2). Additionally, Madeo prohibits mutilations such as tail docking, teeth clipping, and grinding. Sows and pigs have permanent access to straw bedding and enrichment materials at every stage of their lives.

Conversations with Madeo began in September 2023, primarily focusing on its white pig production to develop a corporate policy highlighting its higher practices. Even though the impact in terms of number of animals is limited, the release of Madeo's new policy marks an important step forward, as it becomes the second cage-free policy announced by a renowned Italian pig producer in the last few months. We will leverage this new policy to continue promoting other cage-free commitments within the pig industry in our country.

1

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 1d ago · 1m read
 · 
Hello FAST members   Two months ago we submitted to the Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Agraria  (Senasa), an agency attached to the  Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego  (Midagri), a regulatory proposal aimed at incorporating specific provisions of Animal welfare in the land transport of farm animals. Currently, national legislation only addresses health and hygiene requirements, without establishing criteria to guarantee minimum welfare conditions during transport. This regulatory gap has negative consequences, as it increases animal suffering and the incidence of injuries and mortality, particularly in situations of stress or accidents during transport. Our proposal seeks to align Peruvian regulations with the regional and international standardsIn this sense, we highlight the positive openness of Midagri and Senasa to evaluate the initiative and the relevance of the interest expressed by the Comunidad Andina, which has been promoting regulatory harmonization in this area among member countries.  In this regard, we have already held a meeting with the group of lawyers from both institutions, as well as with the Andean Community, advancing discussions toward the creation of a joint guide to animal welfare in the Peruvian land transportation system. We trust that the incorporation of animal welfare criteria in transport will represent a significant advance in both animal protection and welfare in the country. Great day, Iselda Livoni Arba Peru