Hide table of contents
by Livia Schonenberg
Oct 8 20243 min read 0

3

Insect AdvocacyVictories & Achievements Fish & AquaticEducation & AdvocacyFAST CommunityResearch & Data
Frontpage

Aquatic Life Institute (ALI) is thrilled to announce the release of the 3rd Aquaculture Certification Schemes Benchmark: Aquatic Animal Welfare. This annual report evaluates the welfare standards of 8 global seafood certification schemes and, for the first time, an international ratings agency—Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch program. This year's benchmark evaluates an additional certifier, the Soil Association Organic Standards for Great Britain Aquaculture, thus expanding our assessment to include more certifiers and continuing our commitment to drive improvements for aquatic animal welfare.
 

This benchmark will continue to serve as a valuable tool for businesses, helping them make informed decisions about sourcing sustainable and ethical seafood, while also providing clear guidelines for the evaluated bodies, offering actionable insights on how they can improve their welfare standards.

 

What We Measure
 

The report assesses five key welfare criteria:
 

  1. Water Quality
  2. Stocking Density and Space Requirements
  3. Environmental Enrichment
  4. Feed Composition
  5. Stunning and Slaughter

 

Additionally, certifiers were evaluated on a "Neglected Species Prohibitions" category, with up to 3 bonus points for prohibiting:
 

  1. Octopus farming
  2. Insect use in aquafeed
  3. Eyestalk ablation in shrimp farming

 

Results

* Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) Farm Standard - score (8) is based on draft language/documentation that was directly shared with ALI at the time of evaluation. Requirements will be listed in ASC’s upcoming Farm Standard and/or the supplementary Interpretation Manual. As a result, all ASC scores are subject to change based on what is or is not included in final standard documents shared with the public.

* Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) Salmon Farm Standard - score (4.6) is based on draft language/documentation that was publicly available during the 60 day March - May 2024 consultation period. As a result, all BAP Salmon Farm scores are subject to change based on what is or is not included in final standard documents shared with the public.

* Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) Salmon Standard- score (2) will be discontinued soon, and replaced with the ASC Farm Standard also included in this benchmark evaluation.

 

Key Findings
 

  • 6 out of 9 prohibit eyestalk ablation in shrimp farming: This is a significant step forward in addressing one of the unethical practices in shrimp farming, which involves removing part of the shrimp’s eyestalk to increase reproduction rates.
     
  • 5 out of 9 perform well in stocking density and space requirements: Adequate space and lower stocking densities are critical to improving the welfare of farmed aquatic animals, reducing stress and disease, and promoting healthier environments.
     
  • 4 out of 9 prohibit octopus farming: Building on last year's commitments from RSPCA and Friend of the Sea to ban octopus farming, Aquaculture Stewardship Council and the newly recognized certifier, Soil Association, have also taken a stance against the practice this year.
     
  • Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) Ranks First: The Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) Farm Standard secured the top spot in this year’s benchmark, largely due to its stance against certifying octopus farming. In their September 2024 statement, ASC affirmed, "Currently, and for the foreseeable future, responsible cephalopod farming is not being considered by ASC," underscoring their commitment to ethical aquaculture practices.

    “Aquaculture Stewardship Council is happy to take the leading position among all aquaculture certifications, standards and ratings benchmarked by Aquatic Life Institute (ALI) for the second year in a row. This proves ASC’s commitment towards the improvement of fish welfare through rigorous monitoring and evaluation requirements for seafood farms and key welfare indicators” - Maria Filipa Castanheira, Fish Welfare Coordinator, ASC
     

Why It Matters

 

The eight global seafood certification schemes and one international ratings agency evaluated in this report collectively oversee the welfare of billions of aquatic animals each year. This highlights the immense impact that these bodies have on countless individual lives, underscoring the critical role of benchmark evaluations like this one in driving higher welfare standards across the industry.
 

By publishing these results, we foster competition among certifiers and ratings agencies to improve their standards year over year, ensuring better conditions for farmed aquatic animals globally. This public accountability pushes the industry toward a more compassionate and sustainable future.

 

We invite you to explore the full report and the summary report.

 

NOTE: We acknowledge that the benchmark scoring system does not yet analyze enforcement and compliance of certifiers’ policies reviewed, as those areas currently lie outside of our scope of work. Our theory of change acknowledges that the first step is getting aquatic animal welfare concerns onto the agenda for major certification schemes, and that's exactly what efforts like ours have accomplished. Following this year’s report, Aquatic Life Institute will explore ways to expand our analysis, ensuring we continue to provide the most comprehensive and accurate evaluation possible.
 

3

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

There are no more recommendations left.

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 5d ago · 1m read
 · 
Dear Colleagues, The Animal Law Foundation has placed a fake advertisement in London to raise awareness about the contrast between what the public is sold and the reality of animal farming. This follows a report and an investigation into how animals raised for food are depicted and the reality of the lives animals live. Actress and comedian Diane Morgan and TV Presenter Wendy Turner joined us to raise awareness about this Food Chain Misinformation! The Animal Law Foundations work included an investigation into supermarkets, producers and the media in the UK, which revealed that the dominant image for animal farming is happy and healthy animals outside, this is despite the fact 85% are raised on industrial farms. This is against the backdrop of laws and rules protecting consumers and the public from misleading and dishonest information. You can learn more about our work here and read the report here.  You can find photos from the day and ways you can support the action in our partner pack here. Please also find our links to one of our films from the day with Diane Morgan below, we would be grateful if you could share on your platforms. X (Twitter) Instagram Linkedin Bluesky Threads TikTok YouTube Thank you for all your support, Morgane
 · 5d ago · 1m read
 · 
In the vegan and animal advocacy movement, operations professionals are the engine behind the mission - keeping organizations running smoothly, sustainably, and strategically. But let’s be honest: being “in operations” often means wearing every hat at once. You’re responding to people’s needs, managing financial activity, ensuring legal compliance, maintaining systems, and reducing risk and solving unexpected problems - sometimes all in a single day. On top of that, you’re shaping internal culture, promoting wellbeing to prevent burnout, reimagining how teams work together, and exploring how AI can support your mission. It’s a complex mix of responsibilities and specialties - all of it essential, and much of it out of sight. To support, strengthen and celebrate this critical leadership, PEPR is launching 'Enabling Impact: The Animal Advocacy Ops Collective' - an Operations Community for the Farmed Animal & Vegan Advocacy Movement - a collaborative space for connection, shared insights, and collective impact. Members will also gain access to tailored programming, tools, and trend insights designed to help you thrive in your role and power your organization forward.  Please head over to our sign up page to let us know if you are interested in taking part. This new program is in addition to PEPR's existing program offering strategic & advisory operational support to farmed animal advocacy organizations through which we accept organizations on a rolling basis. 
 · 3d ago · 10m read
 · 
A hidden crisis Literally, quintillions1 of animals are suffering and dying right now in the wild, due to disease, hunger, thirst, excessive heat or cold, and other factors. Yet, most people—including those who express concern for animals—fail to give importance to this issue. Why? In this article, we explore the cognitive biases2 that lead us to ignore one of the world’s largest sources of suffering and death.3 Understanding these biases can help us think more clearly about our moral responsibilities. The magnitude of the problem When we think of animal suffering, we often picture factory farms or labs that test on animals. These are indeed serious problems. But the number of wild animals is vastly larger, estimated between 1 and 10 quintillion at any given time.4 To understand this, consider the following analogy: If we compressed the total number of animals exploited by humans and the total number of wild animals into a one-year timeline, the animals used by humans would represent just 14 seconds. Wild animals would represent the remaining 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 46 seconds.1 The vast majority of wild animals suffer daily due to natural causes. Despite its immense scale, this issue receives very little attention. Even among animal advocates and animal ethicists, the problem remains largely ignored. This doesn’t seem logical when looking at the figures. Below, we will explore several biases that can cause this. Status quo bias: Resistance to changing beliefs Our minds are naturally resistant to change, whether in habits or beliefs. This is known as status quo bias. Several related patterns reinforce this: * Bandwagon effect: we tend to believe what those around us believe * System justification bias: we defend current systems and norms * Conservatism bias: we hesitate to update our beliefs, even with new evidence Key question: If everyone around you focused only on animal exploitation, how likely would you be to think about the suffering o
Recent opportunities
View more