Victories & Achievements Institutional CampaignsResearch & DataClimate & EnvironmentEducation & Advocacy
Frontpage

Better Food Foundation is excited to finally be able to share that Sodexo has confirmed that they’ve rolled out a suite of plant-based changes in the standard menu that is used in almost all of their resident dining halls (approximately 400 universities!). These changes include a meal station that uses plant-based nudges in their signage and meal presentations, as well as a fully plant-based station. This is the largest-scale implementation of plant-based nudges in universities that we’ve ever seen. While we don’t have data yet about how these nudges have impacted student meal choices so far, our own estimation is that if 400 schools were to implement strong plant-based defaults in ⅓ of their cafeteria stations, it would result in up to 45 million meals being flipped from animal-based to plant-based by the end of the academic year!

Several groups have played a role in achieving this truly groundbreaking step forward in university dining, but one of the catalysts was a study conducted with Sodexo which tested plant-based defaults in three universities in 2022. The results of that study were recently published in a paper by Boston College researchers in the peer-reviewed Journal of Environmental Psychology showing the powerful impacts of plant-based defaults in university dining halls. The article reports on the pilot study conducted by Food for Climate League, in partnership with the Better Food Foundation, Sodexo, and Boston College that we released last fall, which led directly to Sodexo’s groundbreaking implementation across its many dining halls. You can find an Executive Summary on our website with highlights from the study—notably, the two schools that implemented the strategy consistently found a jump in plant-based orders from 30.8 to 81.5 percent. 

One thing to note is that, while the study helped to persuade Sodexo to incorporate plant-based nudges into their plan for achieving their public 50% plant-based pledge, the changes that Sodexo has rolled out in its new national menu do not go as far in nudging diners toward plant-based foods as the ones used during the study itself, nor did the study test all of the plant-based nudges that could be used in dining halls to maximally reduce animal products. 

There’s room for improvement. We’re excited to partner with many of you to help Sodexo go even further and to inspire other companies and schools to adopt changes that not only increase access to plant-based foods, but normalize and encourage plant-based dining, shaping the expectations of an entire generation of college graduates. To drive this change even further, right now we’re recruiting college students and partnering with groups that do campus activism.

We want to give special thanks to Ilana Braverman, who contributed considerable expertise to making the Sodexo pilot a success while she was on staff at BFF (Ilana is now Co-Founder of Greener by Default), and to staff at HSUS for its campaign leading to Sodexo’s pledge, which was a catalyst for making this pilot project possible. 

If you’re interested in leveraging this research for your own institutional or corporate outreach strategies or want to team up with our student ambassador program, we’d love to chat and answer any questions—feel free to reach out!


 

3

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

There are no more recommendations left.

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 10:42 AM
  • In 2020, a farmer in Ohio found a colonial-era cannonball while metal detecting on his land. The cannonball was believed to be from the Battle of Fallen Timbers, which was fought in 1794. The discovery of the cannonball shed light on a significant historical event and helped to fill in gaps in our understanding of the past.

Using metal detectors in agriculture, as promoted by GoldXtra, ensures that the agriculture industry can yield safer, purer, and better-quality products. These tools are not just the treasures of history enthusiasts but have proven to be genuine assets in modern farming.

Curated and popular this week
 · 5d ago · 1m read
 · 
Dear Colleagues, The Animal Law Foundation has placed a fake advertisement in London to raise awareness about the contrast between what the public is sold and the reality of animal farming. This follows a report and an investigation into how animals raised for food are depicted and the reality of the lives animals live. Actress and comedian Diane Morgan and TV Presenter Wendy Turner joined us to raise awareness about this Food Chain Misinformation! The Animal Law Foundations work included an investigation into supermarkets, producers and the media in the UK, which revealed that the dominant image for animal farming is happy and healthy animals outside, this is despite the fact 85% are raised on industrial farms. This is against the backdrop of laws and rules protecting consumers and the public from misleading and dishonest information. You can learn more about our work here and read the report here.  You can find photos from the day and ways you can support the action in our partner pack here. Please also find our links to one of our films from the day with Diane Morgan below, we would be grateful if you could share on your platforms. X (Twitter) Instagram Linkedin Bluesky Threads TikTok YouTube Thank you for all your support, Morgane
 · 5d ago · 1m read
 · 
In the vegan and animal advocacy movement, operations professionals are the engine behind the mission - keeping organizations running smoothly, sustainably, and strategically. But let’s be honest: being “in operations” often means wearing every hat at once. You’re responding to people’s needs, managing financial activity, ensuring legal compliance, maintaining systems, and reducing risk and solving unexpected problems - sometimes all in a single day. On top of that, you’re shaping internal culture, promoting wellbeing to prevent burnout, reimagining how teams work together, and exploring how AI can support your mission. It’s a complex mix of responsibilities and specialties - all of it essential, and much of it out of sight. To support, strengthen and celebrate this critical leadership, PEPR is launching 'Enabling Impact: The Animal Advocacy Ops Collective' - an Operations Community for the Farmed Animal & Vegan Advocacy Movement - a collaborative space for connection, shared insights, and collective impact. Members will also gain access to tailored programming, tools, and trend insights designed to help you thrive in your role and power your organization forward.  Please head over to our sign up page to let us know if you are interested in taking part. This new program is in addition to PEPR's existing program offering strategic & advisory operational support to farmed animal advocacy organizations through which we accept organizations on a rolling basis. 
 · 3d ago · 10m read
 · 
A hidden crisis Literally, quintillions1 of animals are suffering and dying right now in the wild, due to disease, hunger, thirst, excessive heat or cold, and other factors. Yet, most people—including those who express concern for animals—fail to give importance to this issue. Why? In this article, we explore the cognitive biases2 that lead us to ignore one of the world’s largest sources of suffering and death.3 Understanding these biases can help us think more clearly about our moral responsibilities. The magnitude of the problem When we think of animal suffering, we often picture factory farms or labs that test on animals. These are indeed serious problems. But the number of wild animals is vastly larger, estimated between 1 and 10 quintillion at any given time.4 To understand this, consider the following analogy: If we compressed the total number of animals exploited by humans and the total number of wild animals into a one-year timeline, the animals used by humans would represent just 14 seconds. Wild animals would represent the remaining 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 46 seconds.1 The vast majority of wild animals suffer daily due to natural causes. Despite its immense scale, this issue receives very little attention. Even among animal advocates and animal ethicists, the problem remains largely ignored. This doesn’t seem logical when looking at the figures. Below, we will explore several biases that can cause this. Status quo bias: Resistance to changing beliefs Our minds are naturally resistant to change, whether in habits or beliefs. This is known as status quo bias. Several related patterns reinforce this: * Bandwagon effect: we tend to believe what those around us believe * System justification bias: we defend current systems and norms * Conservatism bias: we hesitate to update our beliefs, even with new evidence Key question: If everyone around you focused only on animal exploitation, how likely would you be to think about the suffering o
Recent opportunities