I attended the How to Publish a Pro-Animal Op-Ed talk by Jessica Scott-Reid yesterday, which was very informative.

To those of you who are interested in the topic - here are the session highlights, to the best of my note-taking ability. They will also have a recording up in a few days, which I'll add to this post.

 

  • “Write what you know” / unique POV:
    • In your pitch, convince the editor you are the one person that can tell this story
    • Even if you’re not a domain expert
    • Example: when Jessica volunteered for an animal shelter, she leverages that “insider” POV to pitch her story
  • Opinion pieces usually come off headline news
    • If it’s not in the news / social media – it’s harder to write about it
    • Keep on top of that via Google alerts – with relevant keywords
      • E.g. “vegan” / “animals” + your city/region
    • Local papers are the easiest to get into. Then you can work up to national.
  • How to pitch
    • Starting point: a headline
    • Look for the opinion editor of that paper
      • If their email address isn’t public, “hack it” – find emails of other staff members (mostly PR) for the email pattern
    • Draft the pitch:
      • Introduce yourself + what you do 
      • Include links to pieces you’ve published before
      • “I’m interested in contributing an opinion column regarding” + whatever headline you’re referring to + link to that headline
      • A paragraph describing your position and why
        • Keep it short
        • Jessica’s tip: don’t use “I think”. It’s implied.
      • Give a draft deadline
      • Jessica ends with “thoughts?” – though she warns it’s cheeky 😉
      • Sign off (+credentials)
    • If editors are interested – will probably get back to you immediately
      • You can follow up within 24 hours if didn’t reply.
        • “You’re not going to annoy anyone, that’s their job”
    • Sign a contract. Discuss a fee! Make sure you’re getting paid.
      • Fees range wildly. Mostly between $150 to $1/word for a 900 words piece.
      • Median is $300
  • Op-ed structure:
    • Opinion pieces are often written as speeches
    • A bit of narrative/story at the start is good. Makes it easier to read.
      • Example: a piece about a ban on shark fins – the first paragraph describes a shark’s (sad) encounter with a fishing boat
      • Describing from the animal’s POV is especially impactful
    • 2nd paragraph: “news hook”.
    • Around the 3rd paragraph – “make your case known”. Your thesis.
      • “This is known/unacceptable/wrong”. Make a value judgement.
    • Then: move into the “because”.
      • That can vary a lot depending on the publication.
      • Some don’t really care about other sources and voices. Some do.
      • The main source should be where we got the headline
      • Comment sections can also be helpful
      • We want other voices to confirm our position
      • Warning about working with animal advocacy groups:
        • “Most can be trusted, some cannot”. Some manipulate facts.
        • Always cross-reference, question their methods, confirm locations of where they say things happened. Always get a second confirmation.
      • Fact-check ourselves. The editors won’t. 
        • When we do – include links in our texts, to the most credible sources for those facts. 
        • The paper may not include the links, but it’s important as evidence to the editor. Otherwise, they might get back to us asking for it.
    • Tone and language
      • Have some freedom since it’s an op-ed
      • “We can be passionate, but not sensational”. Find the sweet spot.
      • Can use more adjectives, emphasis. But don’t exaggerate and don’t misrepresent.
      • We’re writing about animal mistreatment – “often, the facts are shocking enough”; “there’s no need for hyperbole, it’s already there”.
    • The editing process
      • Be open, don’t take it personal – BUT – don’t sacrifice your message and your voice.
    • Some extra tips:
      • Better to pitch first, before writing the whole piece. We want to know about word count, and we want to (maybe) get guidance form the editor about what they want to see.
      • If the topic cannot be tied to current headlines:
        • Based off social media events
          • If the media hasn’t picked it up – it can also be presented as an exclusive
        • If no current event in that topic - have something ready and waiting for the next time such a headline shows up
      • Letters to the editor are important. Even if they don’t get published – it shows the editors people care about that topic, so they’re more likely to publish an op-ed that comes in.
      • Don’t pitch to different publications at the same time. Space it out 24-48 hours. Otherwise, you might get a “yes” from more than one and have to say no, you don’t want that. 
      • If you aren’t known yet – teaming up with co-workers that are more known is a good strategy
      • Tips for pitching to wider publications: 
        • Making sure it’s timely, connected to something from that publication or at least a broad topic that was in the news – something that was of national importance
        • Emphasizing the insider POV, the one person that can talk about it more than anyone else
        • Paying extra attention to how animal-related topics were published in that publication in the past, then apply those patterns in our own pitches

 

Jessica is happy to answer questions; can be reached at jessica@sentientmedia.org.

1

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

There are no more recommendations left.

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
amypwilson
 · 5d ago · 2m read
 · 
Dear Friends, You are invited to a landmark animal protection and law event in South Africa (and online)! Join us for a first-of-its-kind event in South Africa, a Colloquium on ‘Transforming Animal Protection Legislation in South Africa: A Constitutional Imperative’. 📅 Dates: 5 & 6 May 2025 🕘 Time: 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM SAST (both days) 📍 Online & In-person [Zoom & @University of Johannesburg, Kerzner Building] This 2-day hybrid colloquium brings together a powerful network of legal minds, government representatives, scientists, civil society leaders, judges, prosecutors, veterinarians, academics, activists and members of the public to chart a bold new course for animal protection in the country, grounded in our progressive Constitution and in pursuit of achieving inclusive justice.  Co-hosted by Animal Law Reform South Africa (ALRSA), Humane World for Animals Africa and the South African Institute for Advanced Constitutional, Public, Human Rights and International Law (SAIFAC) [collectively the Animal Law Project], it offers a critical platform to engage with and advocate for transformative animal law reform. Why This Matters: The South African government, through the Department of Agriculture, is currently overhauling the regulatory regime for animals through the drafting of a new ‘Animal Welfare Bill’. The existing animal ‘protection’ regime consists of antiquated laws, some 90 years old, passed during the abhorrent system of apartheid, and which are not aligned with our new constitutional ethos. Nearly a decade ago, South Africa’s Constitutional Court affirmed that animals are sentient beings with intrinsic value and connected human rights to the protection of animal interests - yet, the law has not been updated with this approach. As government initiates work on this new bill, it is critical that they develop a law that recognises these issues and developments.  This Colloquium builds on the Animal Law Project’s widely-endorsed ‘Manifesto for Transformin
 · 5d ago · 1m read
 · 
Animal Outlook appealed the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Civil Division's dismissal of its lawsuit against the American Heart Association under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act, alleging that, in exchange for a fee, AHA allows companies to display its "Heart-Check" mark on certain meat products and market them as “heart healthy”--counter to its own prior statements about the effects on cardiovascular health of consuming those products. The lawsuit also alleges that AHA promotes its Heart-Check certification program as using standards more stringent than the government’s standards for beef, when, in fact, AHA only uses the government’s minimum standards.
 · 5d ago · 1m read
 · 
Following a tip from a concerned supporter, our Freedom of Information Act request uncovered grim details of the mass culling of 100,000 birds killed with carbon dioxide foam and survivors having their necks broken with a "Koechner Euthanizing Device." The story was published this week in The New York Post.   Before this mass culling, Crescent Duck Farm supplied 4% of America's duck meat while polluting the North Fork area with the unmistakable stench of factory farming.  Animal Outlook is reaching out to Crescent through our Farm Transitions program, offering support to shift from animal agriculture to sustainable crop production, which would create a win for animals, the environment, and the local community. This approach exemplifies our commitment not just to exposing cruelty, but to offering practical solutions for a more compassionate food system. Thanks to John Di Leonardo of Humane Long Island for sharing local wisdom and connections.