Hi FAST!

I would like to share some disturbing news from Sweden. 

By law, cows in Sweden must be able to graze outside in the summer, reflecting their natural behavior and needs. A recent government inquiry has, however, proposed removing this law – threatening a cornerstone of Swedish animal welfare that has stood for decades.

This law, introduced in part as a tribute to Swedish author Astrid Lindgren on her 80th birthday, ensures that cattle older than six months, except for bulls, are given the opportunity to graze freely in summer. However, the inquiry recommends abolishing the requirement for cows housed in free-stall systems, which represent around 80% of cows in Sweden’s dairy industry. Whether the Swedish government chooses to proceed with the proposal remains to be seen. 

Project 1882 is at the forefront of opposing this inquiry and our “Jag vill beta” (I want to graze) campaign have gathered over 90,000 signatures to defend the grazing rights for cows. We are working tirelessly to raise public awareness, and plan on delivering the petition to the Swedish government in two weeks, pushing to maintain this crucial right for cows.

Read more: https://www.project1882.org/news/swedish-cows-unique-grazing-rights-are-under-threat

3

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 · 24m ago · 1m read
 · 
We’re thrilled to share a victory for animals and truth in advertising! Thanks to Animal Outlook’s lawsuit, filed with the incredible support of Legal Impact for Chickens (LIC), the nearly 100-year-old DC butcher shop, Harvey’s Market, has agreed to stop selling foie gras forever. The case, filed in the District of Columbia Superior Court, challenged Harvey’s Market’s alleged deceptive advertising practices related to foie gras. The lawsuit alleged that Harvey’s Market falsely promoted foie gras as “HUMANELY RAISED STOCK” and “FREE RANGE,” among other allegedly misleading claims. These statements were displayed inside Harvey’s Market in a manner that suggested they applied to every product in the meat case, including foie gras. AO and LIC argued that animals subjected to gavage (force-feeding) to produce foie gras can never be “humanely raised,” and that animals raised entirely indoors without outdoor access cannot be considered “free range.” Thanks to the efforts of LIC’s amazing legal team—Kathryn Evans and Alene Anello—we were able to send the message that deceptive claims about animal welfare will not go unchallenged. As part of the case, LIC sourced a unique poll of DC consumers to show 75% believe “humane raised stock” to be an inaccurate description of the birds used to make foie gras. A further 80% said they would not consider such birds to be “free range”. And when shown an image of the meat case from Harvey’s Market approximately 65% said they thought the signage applied to all products in the case, including the foie gras.  While Harvey’s Market did not admit liability, Animal Outlook voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit on July 1, 2025, following the confidential settlement agreement.